Nearly a month ago, the National Enquirer broke the news that a massage therapist in Oregon claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Al Gore. Since then, the media has snickered, rolled its eyes, and steadfastly refused to report the story. Instead, they’ve trotted out excuses in Gore’s defense, often treating it as a simple choice between defending Gore’s integrity or indulging in a base appetite for celebrity scandal, as if there wasn’t a real possibility that a real 54-year-old woman had suffered a very real and violent assault.
I get it. Sexual assault is scary. We want to think it could never happen to us or anyone we love—or could be committed by anyone we respect. We want to avoid thinking about it so much that we weave a web of soothing fiction: she wanted it, what did she expect in her line of work, she's obviously just after his money. And, of course: he's a really good guy. He would never do something like that.
It's natural to want to imagine the perpetrators of sexual violence as monsters. It's a monstrous act, after all. But sexual predators aren't monsters. They're people. They can be handsome and seem kind. They can kiss their wives in public and mean it. They can be brothers, boyfriends, best buddies, talented film directors, beloved athletes, trusted priests and, yes, even lefty political heroes who seem like genuinely nice guys.
As I write in my essay on TheNation.com, the excuses used to cast doubt on the victim’s credibility are easily debunked. But the “credibility” question itself is a red herring. Why, in cases of sexual violence, is the victim assumed guilty of lying until proven innocent? We assume that people who say they’ve been victims of robberies or kidnappings are credible enough to report on unless there's clear evidence to the contrary. Barring that, it’s the media’s responsibility - and our own - to take allegations of sexual violence seriously.
I don’t know if Gore did what he’s been accused of, and neither do you. But when we ignore cases like this, we send a terrible message to the victims of powerful men everywhere: that they’re just not important enough to care about. And we tell those powerful men that they can treat women however they want to, so long as they look good in a suit and make a convincing PowerPoint slideshow.
Jaclyn Friedman is Executive Director of Women, Action & the Media, and editor of Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape.







I can hardly think of any stories like this were increased media involvement has made anything better for anyone. I can think of several cases were the opposite has happened. I’d prefer if these cases were confidential until a verdict is in, as in done in other countries. It protects the rights of all involved and helps the integrity of the process remain. I certainly don’t think there’s any reason to believe media coverage isn’t going to benefit her.
By Leslie on July 19th, 2010 at 11:04 pm
[...] week, PWV Alum Jaclyn Friedman released an article and video blog through The Nation on GRITtv exploring the media reaction to the recent allegations of sexual [...]
By PWV Alum Jaclyn Friedman on the Media Portrayal of Al Gore and Sexual Assault – WMC Blog on July 21st, 2010 at 5:29 pm
It’s now August and this comment is being aired. Since this particular incident has been shown to be based upon questionable information–the individual involved (Hagerty) and her attorneys were “uncooperative, failed a polygraph examination and she would not say whether she was paid by a tabloid newspaper for her story.” This case should be ignored. You should check your facts.
By Patty on August 25th, 2010 at 5:16 pm